MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321489955 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-4176

Sea level variability across the Northwest Atlantic shelf

2023· preprint· en· W4321489955 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anrijs Abele, Sam Royston, Jonathan Bamber

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographyTide gaugeAltimeterSea levelGeologyOcean currentClimatologySea-surface heightSpatial variabilitySubmarine pipelineSea surface temperatureEnvironmental scienceRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocean dynamics plays a prominent role in the change of sea level variability on approach to the coast. While some studies have focused on decadal changes at tide gauges, a gap remains in understanding higher frequency variability, which provides a significant proportion of total variability in the coastal region. The Northwest Atlantic, an area including the U.S. East coast and Atlantic Canada, is a known hotspot of sea level rise and shows spatial differences in lower frequency variability along the shelf. However, the higher frequency variability is rarely explored, despite being at least partly captured by the observation systems.In this study, we evaluated the sea level variability across the sub-annual timescales on the shelf of the Northwest Atlantic and linked it to the local and far-field ocean dynamics. The drivers of sea level variability include both wind-driven and buoyancy-driven circulation. We used high-frequency tide gauge records, eddy-resolving high-resolution (1/12°) ocean reanalysis, and high-precision synthetic aperture radar (SAR) altimeter along-track data to obtain sea level anomalies for the analysis. We evaluated the coherence of sea level signal for all sources and with the drivers of ocean circulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→