MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321491510 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-2240

Large-scale dynamical drivers associated with sub-daily extreme rainfall in Europe

2023· preprint· en· W4321491510 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Whitford, Hayley J. Fowler, Stephen Blenkinsop, Rachel White

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsClimatologyExtreme weatherScale (ratio)Environmental sciencePercentileSubtropical ridgeFlash floodSpatial ecologyGeographyMeteorologyClimate changePrecipitationCartographyFlood mythGeologyOceanographyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Short-duration (3hr) extreme rainfall events can cause significant socioeconomic and structural damage, alongside loss of life, due to their ability to generate dangerous flash floods, particularly in urban areas and small catchments. With the projected future increase in the frequency and intensity of these events due to global warming, it is imperative to improve our ability to provide warning to communities that may be impacted by these floods. Large-scale atmospheric dynamics play a role in generating the conditions conducive to the development of local-scale sub-daily extremes, but our current understanding of these processes is limited. Additionally, large-scale circulations are inherently more forecastable than small-scale features such as convection, therefore, this project focuses on finding connections between the large-scale dynamics and sub-daily extremes.This study uses the quality-controlled Global Sub-Daily Rainfall dataset to identify past extreme events in western Europe. The atmospheric circulation pattern present on the day of each event is extracted from the UK Met Office’s set of 30 weather patterns (WPs) based on mean sea level pressure. This information is then used to examine the intensity and frequency of extreme events under each WP, leading to analysis of the spatial connections between the WPs and sub-daily extremes.Results indicate just 5 of the 30 WPs account for 53% of recorded 3hr events above the 99.9th percentile in Europe in summer. The important WPs are a mixture of those showing a cyclonic system (cut-off low) close to or over western Europe and those representing a transitional environment. There are also distinct spatial patterns to the relationships in some cases, for example WP11 (isolated low pressure centred over the south-west UK), is associated with very high frequency of extremes over the UK and Portugal but much lower frequencies elsewhere in Europe. The identification of a select group of WPs as important for the generation of sub-daily extremes has implications for forecasting these events at longer lead times, as the large-scale WPs can be predicted further ahead than local conditions.The WP-based analysis is supplemented by investigation of the links between the sub-daily rainfall extremes and synoptic scale Rossby wave patterns. The Local Finite Amplitude Wave Activity (LWA) metric is used to identify regions of anomalous cyclonic or anticyclonic wave activity both prior to and during the extreme events. This analysis indicates anomalous cyclonic wave activity at certain locations, including over Alaska, to the west of the British Isles and over northern Siberia, is significantly correlated with extreme rainfall over Europe. It is also possible to trace the LWA in days leading up to the extreme events, enabling identification of wave patterns that evolve into conditions associated with the extremes.These results offer new evidence on the role of large-scale dynamics associated with sub-daily extreme rainfall, whilst also providing powerful information that could be used in the forecasting of these events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→