Monitoring lake ice phenology from CYGNSS: Algorithm development and assessment using Qinghai Lake, Tibet Plateau, as a case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study introduces the first use of Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) for monitoring lake ice phenology. This is demonstrated using Qinghai Lake, Tibetan Plateau, as a case study. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) values obtained from the Cyclone GNSS (CYGNSS) constellation over four ice seasons (2018 to 2022) were used to examine the impact of lake surface conditions on reflected GNSS signals during open water and ice cover seasons. A moving t-test (MTT) algorithm was applied to time-varying SNR values allowing for the detection of lake ice at daily temporal resolution. Strong agreement is observed between ice phenology records derived from CYGNSS and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) imagery. Differences during freeze-up (i.e., the period starting with the first appearance of ice on the lake until the lake becomes fully ice covered) ranged from 3 to 21 days with a mean bias error (MBE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of 10 days, while those during breakup (i.e., the period beginning with the first pixel of open water and ending when the whole lake becomes ice-free) ranged from 3 to 18 days (MBE and MAE: 6 and 7 days, respectively). Observations during the breakup period revealed the sensitivity of GNSS reflected signals to the onset of surface (snow and ice) melt before the appearance of open water conditions as determined from MODIS. While the CYGNSS constellation is limited to the coverage of lakes between 38° S and 38° N, the approach presented herein will be applicable to data from other GNSS-R missions that provide opportunities for the monitoring of ice phenology from large lakes globally (e.g., Spire constellation of satellites).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".