Synthesis, homogenisation and regionalisation of inland water greenhouse gas budget estimates for the RECCAP2 initiative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inland waters are important sources of the greenhouse gasses (GHGs) carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) to the atmosphere. While a growing number of global estimates of inland water GHG emissions exists, the integration of inland waters into regional GHG budgets is often hampered by the lack of adequate geo-spatial datasets. Moreover, existing estimates diverge substantially, in part due to persisting uncertainties related to the size and distribution of effective inland water surface areas. In the framework of the 2nd phase of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP-2) initiative, we synthesize existing estimates of GHG emissions from streams, rivers, lakes and reservoirs, and homogenize them with regard to underlying global maps of inland water surface areas and the effects of seasonal ice cover. We then produce estimates of inland water GHG emissions for 10 extensive land regions that are used for the regional land budgets of RECCAP2. According to our synthesis, global inland waters emit 5.6 (3.5-9.1) Pg CO2 yr-1, 101 (83-135) Tg CH4 yr-1 and 326 (254-592) Gg N2O yr-1. South American rivers contribute about one third of global inland water CO2 emissions. North-American and Russian lakes contribute together one third of global inland water CH4 emissions. Finally, North America alone contributes one fourth of global inland water N2O emissions.The global inland water emissions sum up to a global warming potential (GWP) of an equivalent emission of 13.6 (10.0-20.3) and 8.3 (5.8-12.7) Pg CO2 yr-1 at a 20- and 100-year horizon, respectively. At 100-year horizon, the contribution of CO2 dominates the GWP of global inland water GHG emissions, with rivers being the largest emitters. At the 20-year horizon, on the contrary, lakes and rivers are equally important emitters, and the contributions of CH4 to the GWP of inland water GHG emissions even exceed those of CO2. Contributions of N2O to the GWP appear to be less significant at both time horizons. Normalized to the area of the RECCAP-2 land regions, South America and South East Asia show the highest inland water emission rates in terms of GWP, dominated by riverine CO2 emissions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".