MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321493926 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05003

Apparatus for Automated Continuous Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry Measurements from Milliseconds to Hours

2023· article· en· W4321493926 on OpenAlexafffund
Joseph F. Anacleto, Cristina Lento, Vladimir Sarpe, Ayesha Maqsood, Banafsheh Mehrazma, David C. Schriemer, Derek J. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHydrogen–deuterium exchangeChemistryMillisecondMass spectrometryDeuteriumWorkflowCharacterization (materials science)RangingHydrogenBiological systemNanotechnologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyComputer scienceNuclear physicsPhysicsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) is a rapidly growing technique for protein characterization in industry and academia, complementing the "static" picture provided by classical structural biology with information about the dynamic structural changes that accompany biological function. Conventional hydrogen deuterium exchange experiments, carried out on commercially available systems, typically collect 4-5 exchange timepoints on a timescale ranging from tens of seconds to hours using a workflow that can require 24 h or more of continuous data collection for triplicate measurements. A small number of groups have developed setups for millisecond timescale HDX, allowing for the characterization of dynamic shifts in weakly structured or disordered regions of proteins. This capability is particularly important given the central role that weakly ordered protein regions often play in protein function and pathogenesis. In this work, we introduce a new continuous flow injection setup for time-resolved HDX-MS (CFI-TRESI-HDX) that allows automated, continuous or discrete labeling time measurements from milliseconds to hours. The device is composed almost entirely of "off-the-shelf" LC components and can acquire an essentially unlimited number of timepoints with substantially reduced runtimes compared to conventional systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207