MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321496210 · doi:10.5194/tc-2022-258

Black carbon concentrations and modeled smoke deposition fluxes to the bare ice dark zone of the Greenland Ice Sheet

2023· preprint· en· W4321496210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alia L. Khan, Joshua P. Schwarz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGreenland ice sheetSnowMineral dustAlbedo (alchemy)BimodalityAtmospheric sciencesGeologyEnvironmental scienceIce sheetAerosolOceanographyPhysicsGeomorphologyAstrophysicsGalaxyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Ice-albedo feedbacks in the ablation region of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) are difficult to constrain and model due in part to our limited understanding of the seasonal evolution of the bare-ice region. To help fill observational gaps, 13 surface samples were collected on the GrIS across the 2014 summer melt season from patches of snow that were visibly light, medium, and dark colored. These samples were analyzed for their refractory black carbon (rBC) concentrations and size distributions with a Single Particle Soot Photometer coupled to a characterized nebulizer. We present a size distribution of rBC in fresh snow on the GrIS, as well as from surface hoar in the bare ice dark zone of the GrIS. The size distributions from the surface hoar samples appear unimodal, and were overall smaller than the fresh snow sample, with a peak around 0.3 µm. The fresh snow sample contained very large rBC particles that had a pronounced bimodality in peak size distributions, with peaks around 0.2 µm and 2 µm. rBC concentrations ranged from a minimum of 3 µg-rBC/L-H2O in light-colored patches at the beginning and end of the melt season, to a maximum of 32 µg-rBC/L-H2O in a dark patch in early August. On average, rBC concentrations were higher (20 µg-rBC/L-H2O ± 10 µg-rBC/L-H2O) in patches that were visibly dark compared to medium patches (7 µg-rBC/L-H2O ± 2 µg-rBC/L-H2O) and light patches (4 µg-rBC/L-H2O ± 1 µg-rBC/L-H2O), suggesting BC aggregation contributed to snow aging on the GrIS, and vice versa. Additionally, concentrations peaked in light and dark patches in early August, which is likely due to smoke transport from wildfires in Northern Canada and Alaska as supported by the Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System (NAAPS) reanalysis model. According to model output, 26 mg/m3 of biomass burning derived smoke was deposited between April 1st and August 30th, of which 85 % came from wet deposition and 67 % was deposited during our sample collection timeframe. The increase in rBC concentration and size distributions immediately after modelled smoke deposition fluxes suggest biomass burning smoke is a source of BC to the dark zone of the GRIS. Thus, role of BC in the seasonal evolution of the ice-albedo feedback should continue to be investigated in the bare-ice zone of the GrIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→