MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321498667 · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00769-z

Author Correction: Prostate cancer therapy personalization via multi-modal deep learning on randomized phase III clinical trials

2023· erratum· en· W4321498667 on OpenAlexaff
Andre Esteva, Jean Feng, Douwe van der Wal, Shih-Cheng Huang, Jeffry Simko, Sandy DeVries, Emmalyn Chen, Edward M. Schaeffer, Todd M. Morgan, Yilun Sun, Amirata Ghorbani, Nikhil Naik, Dhruv Nathawani, Richard Socher, Jeff M. Michalski, Mack Roach, Thomas M. Pisansky, Jedidiah M. Monson, Farah Naz, James A. Wallace, Michelle Ferguson, Jean-Paul Bahary, James Zou, Matthew P. Lungren, Serena Yeung, Ashley E. Ross, Michael Jonathan Kucharczyk, Luís Souhami, Leslie Ballas, Christopher A. Peters, Sandy Liu, Alexander G. Balogh, Pamela Randolph-Jackson, M.R. Girvigian, Naoyuki G. Saito, Adam Raben, Rachel Rabinovitch, Khalil Katato, Howard M. Sandler, Phuoc T. Tran, Daniel E. Spratt, Stephanie Pugh, Felix Y. Feng, Osama Mohamad

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Digital Medicine · 2023
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreNova Scotia Cancer CentreCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHorizon Health NetworkOccupational Cancer Research CentreSaint John Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonalizationProstate cancerRandomized controlled trialModalPhase (matter)MedicineMedical physicsCancerComputer scienceInternal medicineWorld Wide WebPhysicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of the published Article contained an error in the description of the prostate tissue samples in the Methods and Results sections, which stated that “pretreatment biopsy samples” and “pretreatment prostate biopsies” were used in this study. Both instances have been updated to “pretreatment and posttreatment prostate tissue”, and these changes are reflected in the HTML and PDF versions of the Article. Furthermore, we have added descriptions of the use of posttreatment prostate tissue during model development throughout the Article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Digital MedicineSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207