MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321504064 · doi:10.3138/ctr.193.010

Casting Audiences: How Theatre Passe Muraille’s ‘Black Out Nights’ Challenge Conventional Approaches to Audience

2023· article· en· W4321504064 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Signy Lynch

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamArtBlack BritishWhite (mutation)Visual artsPolitical theatreMedia studiesAestheticsSociologyPolitical scienceGender studiesLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the phenomenon of Black Out Nights, evenings of a theatrical performance for Black-identified audiences only, as employed by Theatre Passe Muraille in Toronto. Drawing on interviews with Passe Muraille’s former Marketing Coordinator Fatuma Adar and current Artistic Director Marjorie Chan, this article explores the various effects and benefits of Black Out Nights, which were first conceived by American playwright Jeremy O. Harris, for Black artists and audiences. I argue that Black Out Nights, along with Theatre Passe Muraille’s other approaches to audiences, help to reveal and to challenge larger practices of ‘casting’ audiences that are employed by mainstream theatres. These casting practices, which operate through theatres’ websites, marketing, and theatre spaces, may be unconsciously exercised but help to reinforce white supremacy and other forms of discrimination and exclusion in theatre spaces through the audiences they make feel welcome and exclude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.022
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.053 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207