An Unusual Endometrial Stromal Neoplasm With JAZF1-BCORL1 Rearrangement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endometrial stromal tumors represent the second most common category of uterine mesenchymal tumors. Several different histologic variants and underlying genetic alterations have been recognized, one such being a group associated with BCORL1 rearrangements. They are usually high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, often associated with prominent myxoid background and aggressive behavior. Here, we report an unusual endometrial stromal neoplasm with JAZF1-BCORL1 rearrangement and briefly review the literature. The neoplasm formed a well-circumscribed uterine mass in a 50-yr-old woman and had an unusual morphologic appearance that did not warrant a high-grade categorization. It was characterized by a predominant population of epithelioid cells with clear to focally eosinophilic cytoplasm growing in interanastomosing cords and trabeculae set in a hyalinized stroma as well as nested and fascicular growths imparting focal resemblance to a uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex-cord tumor, PEComa, and a smooth muscle neoplasm. A minor storiform growth of spindle cells reminiscent of the fibroblastic variant of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma was also noted but conventional areas of low-grade endometrial stromal neoplasm were not identified. This case expands the spectrum of morphologic features seen in endometrial stromal tumors, especially when associated with a BCORL1 fusion and highlights the utility of immunohistochemical and molecular techniques in the diagnosis of these tumors, not all of which are high grade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".