Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extract Reeju Ray’s fascinating, deeply researched book is an original, theoretically sophisticated work. This book will be of much interest well beyond South Asian studies and British Empire history. It will appeal to audiences in socio-legal studies, Indigenous studies, peasant studies, and legal anthropology. The spatial and temporal constitution of peoples and places through various governance techniques is a theme drawing increasing attention from critical scholars. This book’s analysis of how ‘hills’ and ‘tribes’ were constituted in the frontiers of colonial Bengal is an important and timely addition to this literature and will be of interest to readers across several disciplines.’—Mariana Valverde, professor emeritus of socio-legal studies at the University of Toronto ‘Placing the Frontier in British North East India: Law, Custom, and Knowledge is a significant contribution to our understanding of North East India. A stimulating study with refreshing interpretation.’—David R. Syiemlieh, historian and former Vice Chancellor of Rajiv Gandhi University, Arunachal Pradesh
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".