MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321513194 · doi:10.53513/abdi.v2i1.4780

Penerapan Program Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka (Mbkm) Untuk Dosen Dan Mahasiswa Di STIE LMII Medan

2022· article· id· W4321513194 on OpenAlexaff
Nurhayati Nurhayati, Rusmin Saragih, Tioria Pasaribu, Juliana Naftali Sitompul, Zira Fatmaira, Fuzy Yustika Manik, Imeldawaty Gultom, Marto Sihombing, Ratih Puspadini

Bibliographic record

VenueABDIMAS IPTEK · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePedagogySociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Program Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) bertujuan untuk meningkatkan mutu pendidikan di Indonesia sehingga mendorong proses pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi yang semakin otonom dan fleksibel serta Menciptakan kultur belajar yang inovatif, tidak mengekang, dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan mahasiswa. Adapun program MKBM terdiri dari 8 (delapan) kegiatan : magang/praktek kerja, asistensi mengajar di satuan pendidikan, penelitian/riset, proyek kemanusiaan, kegiatan wirausaha, studi/proyek independen, membangun desa/kuliah kerja nyata tematik dan pertukaran pelajar. Yang terlibat dalam program MBKM di Perguruan Tinggi adalah mahasiswa/i, dosen, dan koordinator Perguruan Tinggi. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) LMII Medan dimasa pandemic covid-19 kurang aktif dalam mengikuti dikarenakan sebagian besar mahasiswa/i pulang ke daerah asalnya selama proses pembelajaran secara daring. Yayasan STIE LMII Medan mengikuti pelatihan program Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) sehingga di angkatan program berikutnya dalam berperan serta dalam Program Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueABDIMAS IPTEKSame topicEducational Curriculum and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207