MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321513564 · doi:10.7202/1096796ar

PORTRAIT DES ENJEUX ORGANISATIONNELS EN ÉCOLE DE SITE : L’IMPORTANCE DE VALORISER LA SCOLARISATION DES JEUNES PLACÉ.E.S EN CENTRE DE RÉADAPTATION

2023· article· fr· W4321513564 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Melissa Ziani, Martín Goyette

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social work review · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Québec, sur le terrain des centres de réadaptation pour jeunes en difficulté d’adaptation, des « écoles de site » sont dédiées à la scolarisation des jeunes qui y sont hébergé.e.s. Ces derniers, placé.e.s sous la Loi de la protection de la jeunesse (LPJ) ou de la Loi sur le système de justice pénale pour les adolescents (LSJPA), ont moins tendance à avoir terminé ou d’être en voie de terminer leurs études secondaires avant l’âge de 18 ans. Cet article a pour objectif d’identifier les facteurs organisationnels qui peuvent avoir une incidence sur les parcours scolaires de ces jeunes. Pour ce faire, 25 professionnel.le.s responsables de la scolarisation de ces jeunes ont été interrogé.e.s sur leur expérience de collaboration intersectorielle et les répercussions de celle-ci sur le parcours des jeunes. Les résultats de cette collecte de données qualitatives offrent un nouvel éclairage sur le rôle potentiel des écoles de site dans le processus de réadaptation des jeunes qui fréquentent ces établissements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social work reviewSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207