Bibliographic record
Abstract
Appel de propositions de livresLa Fondation canadienne de fiscalit (FCF ) / Canadian Tax Foundation, un organisme sans but lucratif indpendant de recherche et caractre ducatif, souhaite recevoir des propositions de livres dans les domaines de la fiscalit et des finances publiques.Depuis sa fondation en 1945, la FCF a publi de nombreux livres et articles sur divers sujets dans ses champs d'intrt.La FCF souhaite obtenir des propositions de projets de recherche qui : mneront la rdaction d'un livresur un sujet unique d'intrt en fiscalit ou en finances publiques; seront dirigs par un chercheur chevronn ayant une expertise dans un domaine de la fiscalit ou des finances publiques; seront effectus dans un dlai raisonnable, compte tenu de la nature du projet.Les projets qui seront slectionns par la FCF pourront tre partiellement ou totalement admissibles une aide financire pour la recherche et les frais de publication.La FCF se rserve le droit absolu, et sa seule discrtion, d'appuyer une proposition particulire ou de publier un projet.Toute personne intresse doit faire parvenir un bref sommaire de la proposition pour examen initial par la FCF :
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".