MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321597151 · doi:10.1002/jmv.28594

Ocular tropism of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

2023· letter· en· W4321597151 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Zhang, Jianguo Ju, Fang Yang, Chunfu Zheng, Jingbo Zhai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Virology · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineBlurred visionChillsDermatologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, is still ravaging and has brought unprecedented challenges globally, which can lead to respiratory tract infections, pulmonary inflammation, and multiorgan involvement. 1 More COVID-19 patients with conjunctivitis as the first or concomitant symptom have been observed since the optimization and adjustment of COVID-19 measures in China on December 7, 2022.The following are three typical cases: Case 1: An 8-year-old boy from Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.He was infected by SARS-CoV-2 and visited Ningbo Beilun Second People's Hospital on January 1, 2023, complaining of pain in both eyes, foreign body sensation, blurred vision, tearing, periocular erythema, and suspected drug allergy.Examination revealed no obvious signs of a food or drug allergy.Given the patient's clinical history and symptoms, an ophthalmology referral was required.Case 2: A 30-year-old male from Ningbo visited the above hospital the same day.The COVID-19 patient complained of swollen, sore eyes, increased tear production, and eye secretions the day after the high fever.Case 3: A 50-year-old male patient from Wuhan visited Tianyou Hospital on January 2, 2023, after a high fever accompanied by sore, congested eyes, blurred version and tearing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Virology→Same topicRetinal and Optic Conditions→French-language works237,207→