Machine Learning-Based Hard/Soft Logic Trade-offs in VTR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Circuit optimization, in any application, is of high importance since it not only improves the efficiency of the intended purpose but also enhances the quality of the final product. It enables the circuit designer to cater to the specific needs of the customer. For circuit optimization to occur, we need to elaborate these circuits on a primary level and perform synthesis operations. Previous research shows that the investigation of improvements to different Hardware Description Language (HDL) elaboration phases, was completely closed source. Verilog To Routing (VTR) is an open-source Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tool. ODIN II is the VTR synthesizer that parses the input Verilog, elaborates its Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), performs the partial mapping according to the architecture file, and performs optimizations such as unused logic removal. To that end, the hard versus soft logic trade-off aims to optimize the performance of the circuit. This project focuses on using machine learning approaches to make synthesis tools intelligent enough to decide this ratio on their own, without the need for human intervention, and based on some predefined criteria. This paper discusses the criteria for having less latency or less critical path delay in the circuit. Also, it aims at providing this level of intelligence at an earlier stage in the VTR pipeline to make better use of this information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".