MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321638904 · doi:10.1183/23120541.00523-2022

Quantitative computed tomography and visual emphysema scores: association with lung function decline

2023· article· en· W4321638904 on OpenAlexafffund
Meghan Koo, Wan C. Tan, Jim C. Hogg, Jean Bourbeau, Cameron Hague, Jonathon Leipsic, Miranda Kirby

Bibliographic record

VenueERJ Open Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaToronto Metropolitan University
FundersGovernment of OntarioCanada Research ChairsMcGill UniversityUniversity of TorontoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsMedicineCOPDSpirometryLinear regressionQuantitative computed tomographyInternal medicineComputed tomographyRadiologyCardiologyNuclear medicineAsthmaBone density

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Computed tomography (CT) visual emphysema score is a better predictor of mortality than single quantitative CT emphysema measurements in COPD, but there are numerous CT measurements that reflect COPD-related disease features. The purpose of this study was to determine if linear combinations of quantitative CT measurements by principal component analysis (PCA) have a greater association with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) lower limit of normal (LLN) annualised change (ΔFEV1) than visual emphysema score in COPD. Methods In this retrospective, longitudinal study, demographic, spirometry and CT images were acquired. CT visual emphysema score and quantitative analysis were performed; low attenuation area <950 HU (LAA950) and 12 other quantitative CT measurements were investigated. PCA was used for CT feature extraction. Multiple linear regression models for baseline FEV1LLN and 6-year ΔFEV1were used to determine associations with visual emphysema score and CT measurements. A total of 725 participants were analysed (n=299 never-smokers, n=242 at-risk and n=184 COPD). Results Quantitative CT measures (LAA950and PCA components) were independently statistically significant (p<0.05) in predicting baseline FEV1LLN, whereas visual emphysema score was not statistically significant in any baseline model. When predicting 6-year ΔFEV1, only visual emphysema score was significant (p<0.05) in models with LAA950and PCA combination of emphysema measurements. In the model with PCA using all CT measurements predicting 6-year ΔFEV1, visual emphysema score (p=0.021) along with one PCA component (p=0.004) were statistically significant. Conclusions PCA with a combination of CT measurements reflecting several different COPD-related disease features independently predicted baseline lung function and increased the relative importance of quantitative CT compared with visual emphysema score for predicting lung function decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueERJ Open ResearchSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207