MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321747051 · doi:10.17615/57tr-s550

Laser Spectroscopic Determination of the6He Nuclear Charge Radius

2023· article· en· W4321747051 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R.V.F. Janssens, C.L. Jiang, R.J. Holt, K. Bailey, J.P. Schiffer, J.P. Greene, R.C. Pardo, P. Mueller, X.D. Tang, K.E. Rehm, D. Henderson, G.W.F. Drake, T.P. O'Connor, Z.-T. Lu, L.-B. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueUNC Libraries · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCharge radiusLaserRADIUSAtomic physicsCharge (physics)Materials sciencePhysicsNuclear physicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsProton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The charge radius of 6He was determined by measuring the atomic isotope shift between the 6He and 4He by laser spectroscopy. Calculations were performed based on quantum mechanics which related the 6He - 4He isotope shifts of both 2 3S1-23P2 and 23S 1-33P2 transitions to the difference between the mean square charge radii. The isotope shifts were dominated by mass shifts which were of the order of a few tens of GHz, with the volume shifts being of the order of 1 MHz only. The nuclear charge radius of 6He was determined to be 2.054±0.014 fm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNC LibrariesSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207