MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321747867 · doi:10.17615/0c3b-et41

High-angular-momentum structures in 64Zn

2023· article· en· W4321747867 on OpenAlexfundno aff
D. Seweryniak, G.J. Lane, M. Cromaz, I.Y. Lee, F.S. Stephens, T. Lauritsen, K. Vetter, C. Andreoiu, M.P. Carpenter, T.L. Khoo, R.A.E. Austin, A.O. Macchiavelli, J.C. Waddington, R. Wyss, O. Thelen, D. Karlgren, T. Rodinger, D.G. Sarantites, P. Fallon, C.E. Svensson, T. Steinhardt, I. Ragnarsson, F. Kondev, R.V.F. Janssens, M.A. Deleplanque, A. Görgen, D. Ward, R.M. Diamond, D. Rudolph, R.M. Clark

Bibliographic record

VenueUNC Libraries · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAngular momentumPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-angular-momentum states in 64Zn were populated in the 40Ca( 28Si,4p) reaction at a beam energy of 122 MeV. Evaporated, light, charged particles were identified by the Microball, while γ rays were detected using the Gammasphere array. The main focus of this paper is on two strongly coupled, collective bands. The yrast band, which was previously known, has been linked to lower-lying states establishing the excitation energies and angular momenta of in-band states for the first time. The newly identified excited band decays to the yrast band but firm angular-momentum assignments could not be made. In order to interpret these structures cranked-Nilsson-Strutinsky calculations have been performed. The calculations have been extended to account for the distribution of nucleons within a configuration. The yrast collective band is interpreted as based on the π(f 7/2) -1(p 3/2f 5/2) 2(g 9/2) 1 ν(p 3/2f 5/2) 4(g 9/2) 2 configuration. There are several possible interpretations of the second band but it is difficult to distinguish between the different possibilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNC LibrariesSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207