Testing of a standard model in the VTI's large-subsonic wind-tunnel facility to establish users' confidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A necessity to test a standard model testing for establishing confidence in the wind-tunnel flow quality and the validity of the test-data has been recognized in the Experimental Aerodynamics Laboratory of the Military Technical Institute (VTI) in Belgrade. A new-implemented procedure for data quality assurance has been applied to the standard AGARD-B model testing in the VTI's large-subsonic wind-tunnel. Test-data obtained at Mach number 0.4 have been analized and correlated with those of the physically same model performed in the Canadian NAE (today operates as IAR) 5ft trisonic wind-tunnel and the T-38 trisonic wind-tunnel of VTI. Within-facility comparisons and inter-facility correlations of the standard test-data were done to certify an overall reliabilty of the subsonic facility as an initial step in the establishing the confidence prior to a forthcoming customer test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".