An Online Torque Sharing Function Method Involving Current Dynamics for Switched Reluctance Motor Drives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes an online torque sharing function (TSF) method for torque ripple reduction in switched reluctance machines (SRMs). The proposed TSF takes the current dynamics and induced electromotive force (EMF) into account by establishing a new online current profile generation technique. First, a primary phase current reference derived from the torque reference is applied to the SRM. Then, the decaying phase current after the turn-off angle is sampled and it is used to update the current reference. A new online optimization strategy is performed to shape the current reference during the operation of the machine. Due to the proposed current profile generation technique, the optimization process is decoupled to independently minimize the torque ripple by optimizing the turn-on angle and minimizing copper losses by optimizing the turn-off angle. Compared to the conventional TSFs and existing optimization-based TSFs, the proposed TSF achieves accurate torque control, improved torque–speed capability, reduced torque ripple, and better current tracking performance. Simulations and experiments are performed on a three-phase 12/8 SRM under various operating conditions to validate the proposed online TSF method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".