Opportunities and Challenges of Spaceborne Sensors in Delineating Land Surface Temperature Trends: A Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the land surface temperature (LST) trends is crucial for policymakers and stakeholders to develop adaptation and mitigation strategies suitable for a sustainable environment coping in the face of climate change. This article presents a systematic review of the studies related to delineating spaceborne sensor-based LST trends, including information on the instruments and constellations of satellites (missions) that provide thermal infrared (TIR) and passive microwave (PMW) observations. About 99% of the studies used TIR, where 76% were Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS, onboard Terra/Aqua) observations. Opportunities, challenges, and research gaps for using the TIR and PMW observations were also explored, with instruments onboard either polar-orbiting or geostationary satellites. We identified that the calibrated dataset (e.g., processed, harmonized, and standardized) is extremely limited for each constellation, with multiple satellites and instruments, to make it fully useful for the entire mission period. A few problematic methodological concepts were identified, including using a few images in a longer time series. Using only a few images, acquired on different calendar months in different years, would not provide the true annual trends over the study period because they can be influenced by seasonal variations. To estimate the warming or cooling daytime, nighttime, or diurnal LST trends, the use of MODIS observations could be useful, even though it does not acquire images during the maximum or minimum temperature in a daily cycle. This article indicated further investigations into those research gaps and recommended directions to overcome most of these limitations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".