MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MODELO CALGARY DE AVALIAÇÃO FAMILIAR E A PROFISSIONAL DO SEXO COMO MÃE, MULHER E CHEFE DE FAMÍLIA

2023· article· pt· W4321784026 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelly Cristina do Nascimento, Fábia Maria de Lima, Fátima Maria da Silva Abrão, Flávia Alves Delgado, Maria do Socorro Alécio Barbosa, Renata Cristina Beltrão de Lima, Tereza Natália Bezerra de Lima, Betânia da Mata Ribeiro Gomes

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Foco · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Modelo Calgary de Avaliação da Família é uma estrutura multidimensional que consiste em três categorias principais: estrutural, de desenvolvimento e funcional. O foco da avaliação familiar concentra-se na interação entre todos os membros da família. As trabalhadoras sexuais idosas experimentam em seus domicílios situações difíceis no convívio diário com filhos, noras, ex-noras, e netos adultos que vivenciam a instabilidade do mercado de trabalho. Trata-se de um relato de experiência, com abordagem qualitativa, do qual participaram seis trabalhadoras sexuais idosas, mulheres com faixa etária entre 60 e 70 anos. Essa Roda de Conversa proporcionou uma experiência, onde possibilitou as autoras a compreender as vivências dos relatos relacionado às realidades de cada trabalhadora sexual idosa protagonista da sua vida e suas famílias, como as crises, conflitos, dores, desde a alegria que é o processo de envelhecer. O trabalho neste contexto torna-se uma distração e até mesmo uma fuga de uma realidade de dificuldades de várias ordens, constituindo-se em uma forma bastante peculiar de passar o tempo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista FocoSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207