MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321790047 · doi:10.1080/09518398.2023.2181425

Be/longing: forever Par/des(i)

2023· article· en· W4321790047 on OpenAlexaff
Fatmakhanu Pirbhai-Illich

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican cultural and philosophical studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwahiliHindiSociologyMainstreamMeaning (existential)PoliticsIdeologyGender studiesLiteracyPedagogyLinguisticsPolitical scienceLawEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the western academy, scholarly research is pre-dominantly informed by Euro-western philosophical understandings which in turn influence methodologies, and methods used. Assumptions made that researchers categorized as the Other apply similar paradigmatic lenses create tensions for these researchers whose ways of being, doing and viewing the world diverge from the mainstream. Using narrative and poetic reflections, a Par/des(i) approach to qualitative inquiry provides an onto-epistomological lens for those existing in liminal spaces whose experiences have been influenced by geographical, spiritual, histo-political, emotional, familial, and spiritual disruptions and dislocations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.509
GPT teacher head0.615
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in EducationSame topicAfrican cultural and philosophical studiesFrench-language works237,207