Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous articleNext article Free2023 AnnouncementPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreThe Wordsworth-Coleridge Association is sponsoring a lunch and a scholarly session at the Modern Language Association Convention in San Francisco, January 5–8, 2023.LunchThe lunch will begin with drinks and appetizers at 11:45 a.m., and the main course served about noon on Friday, January 6, in a private room at John’s Grill, 63 Ellis Street, San Francisco. The recipient of the annual Marilyn Gaull Book Award will be honored on this occasion. All are welcome to attend. Advance reservations are requested by December 1. For further details, and to make a lunch reservation: www.johnclare.org/WCASession 603: Romanticism And SexualitySaturday, January 7, 5:15–6:30 p.m.Sierra Suite J, Marriott MarquisProgram arranged by the Wordsworth-Coleridge AssociationPresiding: Charles Waite Mahoney, University of Connecticut, Storrs1. “Blake’s Vegetable Loves,” Noah Heringman, University of Missouri, Columbia2. “Elizabeth Moody’s ‘To Dr. Darwin,’ Women’s Writing, and Sexual Transgression,” David Sigler, University of Calgary3. “Queering Liberation in The Woman of Colour,” Halina Adams, Bridgewater State University Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Wordsworth Circle Volume 53, Number 4Fall 2022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/724503 © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.898 | 0.867 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".