Effect of phosphate fertilizer in the ratio in percentage of Infection on corn Sesamia cretica Led. And relationship to yield production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experiment was made in AL- Qadisiyah province on maize during the autumn season 2007, to know the impact of four levels of phosphate fertilizer (zero, 160, 200, 240 kg P2O5/ h) and two batches.First add all the amount of phosphate fertilizer at one time when agriculture, and the second was added in two waves, when agriculture first and the second after (45 days) from the first installment. Used in the experiment design sectors indiscriminate full R.C.B.D. Used the seeds of Class of (IPA 3003) parents of hybrid maize. Results showed that the level fertilizer 240 kg P2O5/ ha in reducing the incidence of insect after (8, 10, 12 weeks) and at harvest amounted to (2.34, 4.00, 7.86, 15.26)%, respectively, compared to the treatment of comparison and level fertilizer 160 kg P2O5/ h which gave the highest rate of incidence of this insect, also gave the same level fertilizer increase in the sum total of the plant and the winning 5,648 and 6,141 and 7,288 and 8,056 tons / h respectively in the above levels of fertilizer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".