Gambling in retirement. Perspectives of problem and non-problem female gamblers in terms of awareness of risk and consequences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Lelonek-Kuleta B. Gambling in retirement. Perspectives of problem and non-problem female gamblers in terms of awareness of risk and consequences. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania. 2022;35(3):229-244. doi:10.5114/ain.2022.125281. APA Lelonek-Kuleta, B. (2022). Gambling in retirement. Perspectives of problem and non-problem female gamblers in terms of awareness of risk and consequences. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania, 35(3), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.5114/ain.2022.125281 Chicago Lelonek-Kuleta, Bernadeta. 2022. "Gambling in retirement. Perspectives of problem and non-problem female gamblers in terms of awareness of risk and consequences". Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania 35 (3): 229-244. doi:10.5114/ain.2022.125281. Harvard Lelonek-Kuleta, B. (2022). Gambling in retirement. Perspectives of problem and non-problem female gamblers in terms of awareness of risk and consequences. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania, 35(3), pp.229-244. https://doi.org/10.5114/ain.2022.125281 MLA Lelonek-Kuleta, Bernadeta. "Gambling in retirement. Perspectives of problem and non-problem female gamblers in terms of awareness of risk and consequences." Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania, vol. 35, no. 3, 2022, pp. 229-244. doi:10.5114/ain.2022.125281. Vancouver Lelonek-Kuleta B. Gambling in retirement. Perspectives of problem and non-problem female gamblers in terms of awareness of risk and consequences. Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania. 2022;35(3):229-244. doi:10.5114/ain.2022.125281.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it