The Impact of Ground Heat Capacity on Drinking Water Temperature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temperature is known to impact physical, chemical, and biological processes in Drinking Water Distribution Systems (DWDS), but it is rarely considered or modeled. This research evaluates the impact of considering a finite heat capacity for the ground, which has been assumed infinite in previous DWDS research. The aim of this work is to explore and quantify the region where the difference between considering infinite or finite heat capacity for the ground is significant, i.e., the distance over which water-ground heat transfer interaction is important. A detailed model comparison is carried out for key pipe materials, diameters, and hydraulic conditions. Temperature effects are found to exist for up to tens of kilometers (i.e., several hours) into the DWDS. Whereas the differences found were only a few degrees Celsius, this will affect all reaction rates, such as chlorine decay, and is at the start of the DWDS so will impact the entire downstream network. This work highlights the importance of considering temperature in DWDS, and in particular the finite heat capacity of the ground, in ensuring the provision of safe drinking water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".