The Impact of Graft CD3<sup>+</sup> T-Cell Dose on the Outcome of T-Cell Replete Human Leukocyte Antigen-Mismatched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Data on whether the graft CD3-positive (CD3 + ) T-cell dose in T-cell-replete human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic peripheral blood stem cells transplantation (PBSCT) influences post-transplant outcomes are controversial. Methods: Using King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) Blood and Marrow Transplantation (BMT) Registry database, 52 adult subjects, receiving the first T-cell-replete HLA-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic PBSCT for acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndrome, were identified, from January 2017 to December 2020. The cutoff value of graft CD3 + T-cell dose was identified using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) formula and Youden's analysis. Subjects were divided into two cohorts: cohort 1 with low CD3 + T-cell dose (n = 34) and cohort 2 with high CD3 + T-cell dose (n = 18). Correlative analyses were performed between CD3 + T-cell dose and the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), relapse, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). P-values were two-sided and considered significant when P < 0.05. Results: Subject covariates were displayed. Subject's characteristics were comparable, except for higher nucleated cells and more female donors in the high CD3 + T-cell cohort. The 100-day cumulative incidence of acute GvHD (aGvHD) was 45±7% and 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was 28±6.7%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts in aGvHD (50% vs. 39%, P = 0.4) or cGvHD (29% vs. 22%, P = 0.7). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 67.5±16.3% for low compared with 14.3±6.8% for high CD3 + T-cell cohort (P = 0.018). Fifteen subjects relapsed and 24 have died, 13 due to disease relapse. There was an improvement in 2-year RFS (94% vs. 83%; P = 0.0022) and 2-year OS (91% vs. 89%; P = 0.025) in low CD3 + T-cell cohort compared with high CD3 + T-cell cohort. Graft CD3 + T-cell dose is the only significant risk factor for relapse (P = 002), and OS (P = 0.030) in univariate analysis which was maintained in multivariate for relapse (P = 0.003), but not for OS (P = 0.050). Conclusions: Our data suggest that high graft CD3 + T-cell dose is associated with lower risk of relapse, and might improve long-term survival, but has no influence on the risk of developing aGvHD or cGvHD. J Hematol. 2023;12(1):27-36 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jh1071
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".