MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4321995744 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10353

Modelling tectonic flow with discontinuous Galerkin level set method: Case studies and applications  for the Neoarchean crustal dynamics

2023· preprint· en· W4321995744 on OpenAlexaff
Qǐháng Wú, Shoufa Lin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFinite element methodGalerkin methodAdaptive mesh refinementDiscretizationLevel set methodFlow (mathematics)GeophysicsGeometryComputer scienceMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisComputational scienceSegmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new numerical method to simulate the structural patterns emerging from the long-term large-deformation tectonic flows in both two and three spatial dimensions.  The domains of different material properties are each represented by a level set function discretized on a Eulerian mesh with the discontinuous Galerkin method. The level sets are advected by a velocity field provided by a coupled Stokes flow solver. Our method accurately captures the material interface by the adaptive mesh refinement, reduces the computational expenses compared to the traditional particle-in-cell method and offers straightforward handling of geometric splitting and merging.  Under the unified finite element framework, our method promises the flexibility in the choice of mesh geometry as well as the potential for extending to complex rheology.  With passive tracers geat and around areas of interest, the finite strain of the flow field can be integrated through any time interval within the total simulation time.  The strain ellipsoids thus obtained offers the possibility for ground-truthing the simulated deformation patterns with the field structural analysis.  Our results demonstrate identical physical behaviour when compared with established structural geology and geodynamic benchmarks.The style of the crustal dynamics on the Archean Earth has been subject to controversy on whether a vertical tectonic style in the form of Rayleigh-Taylor instability, induced by an inverted density profile, prevails in the early history of the Earth and if so, how the transition to the present-day plate tectonics, characterized by dominantly horizontal movement, is manifested in the rock record.  Equipped with our modelling scheme, we construct numerical models to simulate the lithological distributions and deformation patterns resulted from a synchronous operation of vertical tectonism and horizontal shearing. The latter can be viewed as a possible result of some far-field tectonic boundary condition (e.g. oblique convergence).  Many aspects of the simulation in terms of the map pattern, foliation/lineation trend and strain distribution compare favorably with the field observations in Neoarchean granitoid-greenstone terranes in the Superior Province as well as worldwide.  Therefore, it is concluded that the vertical and horizontal tectonism are not mutually exclusive tectonic regimes  The symbiosis of both tectonic processes is a viable mechanism for establishing the crustal architecture and the deformation pattern we see today in many Neoarchean terranes and might represent a transition from the former to the latter in the Neoarchean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207