Analysis of Purple Coatings by the SuperCam Instrument on the Perseverance Rover in Jezero Crater, Mars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The NASA Perseverance rover has encountered numerous instances of purplish colored surficial material on rocks and pebbles throughout its traverse across the Jezero crater floor and the delta front. These enigmatic materials are visible on many different rock types and can vary in apparent thickness, from being very thin (microns) to several mm thick, and potentially forming in more than one layer. On Earth, such thin layers may form from a variety of processes, e.g., as coatings deposited on rock surfaces, exposed fracture fills, and/or alteration rinds/case hardening. The purple materials observed at Jezero typically unconformably overlie eroded natural rock surfaces, suggesting these features are possibly surface coatings of externally derived material. On Earth, coatings arise due to interactions between rock surfaces and the atmosphere, liquid water, and life. As such, they represent important targets for study on Mars.Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and a microphone, SuperCam is able to analyze these coatings for chemical composition (LIBS) and material properties (recording the LIBS acoustic signal). By interrogating the same location with the LIBS laser multiple times, changes in composition and material properties with shot (depth) may be observed if the layer is thin enough. SuperCam has made 125-150 laser shot depth profiles on several of these coated rocks, at 4-5 locations on each. For each raster, we attempt to have at least one point on an uncoated area to compare with the coated surface profile. Whenever possible, SuperCam analyses of coatings were made at locations adjacent to a rover-made abrasion patch, where the upper ~mm is abraded off to expose the underlying rock. Here we focus on comparing compositions of depth profiles on purple coatings that are directly adjacent to abrasion patches; these targets are Cordoeil (sol 268), near the abrasion patch Dourbes, Chokecherry (sol 378) which is near the Alfalfa abrasion patch, and Pile_Bay (sol 582) located by the Novarupta patch. Coating compositions from these targets roughly matches that of the fine martian dust (e.g., Lasue et al., 2018, doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079210), potentially indicating a link between the two. Airfall dust is an important contributor to rock coating formation on Earth and may likewise play a role for coating formation on Mars.       
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".