MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321996227 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10693

Data acquisition and processing of multi-frequency oscillatory hydraulic tomography in a granular aquifer

2023· preprint· en· W4321996227 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aymen Nefzi, Daniel Paradis, René Lefebvre, Olivier Bour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquiferHydraulic conductivitySlug testHydraulic headTomographyGeologySoil scienceGeotechnical engineeringAnisotropyHead (geology)GroundwaterGeomorphologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transport of solutes in aquifers is controlled by the heterogeneous spatial distribution of hydraulic properties, but the characterization of aquifer heterogeneity is quite challenging with conventional methods. Hydraulic tomography (HT) was developed to define the heterogeneous distribution of hydraulic conductivity (K) and specific storage (Ss). HT involves the emission of a series of hydraulic head perturbations in a stressed well and the recording of this signal at several levels in the stressed and observation wells. All recorded hydraulic head responses are simultaneously analyzed through numerical inversion, which provides the spatial distribution of hydraulic properties at a scale relevant for local site investigations.This communication reports on a tomographic experiment carried out in a heterogeneous and highly anisotropic granular aquifer at the Saint-Lambert research site near Quebec City, Canada. This site has already been the object of detailed characterizations with multiple hydraulic methods: pumping tests, packer slug tests, flowmeter profiles, vertical interference tests, and slug test tomography. A relatively new approach named oscillatory hydraulic tomography (OHT) was tested, in which multi-frequency oscillatory head perturbations are induced in an interval isolated by packers of the stressed well by a submerged rod that is electronically controlled by a winch system. Hydraulic responses are measured in the stressed intervals and in multiple intervals of an observation well.This study was primarily aimed at testing, first on an operational level, if the OHT signal could be generated in the stressed well and propagated to the observation well in a highly anisotropic granular aquifer. Second, the study developed a rigorous workflow for the treatment of the measured hydraulic heads. Third, in terms of characterization efficacy, the study aimed to determine if multiple controlled frequencies would allow the assessment of K spatial distribution.Results show that the field experiment provided clear measured hydraulic responses that could be used to obtain the 2D distribution of hydraulic properties from the inversion of OHT measurements. Comparison was made of inversion results using a single oscillatory frequency and multiple frequencies. Under conditions of realistic field measurement noise and uncertainty, it will be valuable in future work to compare the imaging capabilities of oscillatory hydraulic tomography against other tomographic methods. Further investigation is also needed to examine the information content of oscillatory hydraulic tomographic data for characterizing K and Ss heterogeneities through a sensitivity and resolution analysis. This study demonstrates the practical potential for the implementation of OHT experiments in relatively low permeability and highly anisotropic granular aquifers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGroundwater flow and contamination studies→French-language works237,207→