MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4321996256 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-10396

Ancient scars and rotating ribbons: how Appalachian-Caledonian orogenic inheritance seeded the rotations of the Flemish Cap and the Porcupine Bank during the Mesozoic rifting of the North Atlantic Ocean

2023· preprint· en· W4321996256 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Kim Welford, Michael T. King, Yang Pei

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyRiftPaleontologyContinental marginMesozoicStructural basinTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rifted continental margins of the modern Atlantic Ocean, spanning from pole to pole, encompass the full gamut of margin types and structural styles, with the Newfoundland-Iberia margins arguably having received the greatest amount of scientific scrutiny and attention. Still, the most interesting segment of the Atlantic appears to correspond to the Newfoundland-Galician conjugates and the Newfoundland-Irish Atlantic conjugates, where classic passive margin templates are suddenly replaced by failed rifts and numerous continental ribbons, still tethered to their continents (e.g., Flemish Cap and Porcupine Bank). This region of increased complexity corresponds exactly with the intersection of the Mesozoic rift with pre-existing, and obliquely-oriented, scars from the Paleozoic Appalachian-Caledonian Orogen, providing a world-class laboratory for investigating the influence of inheritance on rifting. A recently published numerical modelling study, simulating the interaction of propagating rifts, revealed that such rifts, when laterally offset by approximately 400 km, can successfully generate and rotate continental ribbons away from their respective rifted continental margins. In particular, that study provided a compelling mechanism to explain the rotation of the Flemish Cap. In this work, we argue for the broader extrapolation of those modelling results to explain the rotations of both the Flemish Cap, offshore Newfoundland, and the Porcupine Bank, offshore Ireland, with the first rift corresponding to the northward propagating Atlantic rift and the second apparent rift corresponding to reactivated Appalachian-Caledonian scars. Consistent with the numerical modelling results, this conceptual rifting model results in failed rifts both within the Orphan Basin, offshore Newfoundland, and within the Porcupine Basin, offshore Ireland, with those failed rift features supported by numerous complementary geophysical studies. Future numerical modelling efforts will be dedicated to testing this relatively simple model of rift-inheritance interactions for the southern North Atlantic to confirm that they are sufficient to explain the observed complexity of margin structures between offshore Newfoundland and its conjugates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→