MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4322001902 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-11972

Unravelling polymetamorphism in greenschist- and amphibolite-facies rocks using thermodynamic modeling and in situ U-Pb dating of REE-minerals (Austroalpine Unit, Eastern Alps, Austria)

2023· preprint· en· W4322001902 on OpenAlexaff
Marianne Sophie Hollinetz, Benjamin Huet, David Schneider, Christopher R.M. McFarlane, Gerd Rantitsch, Bernhard Grasemann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamorphismNappeGeologyGreenschistGeochemistryMonaziteZirconMetamorphic faciesEpidoteGeochronologyFaciesPaleontologyQuartz

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Precise thermobarometric and geochronologic data are crucial to correctly interpret the timing of metamorphism and identify complex polymetamorphic histories. We present new P-T-t-D data from samples collected in two Austroalpine nappes exposed in the Eastern Alps, Austria: the structurally upper greenschist-facies Schöckel Nappe (“Graz Paleozoic,” Drauzug-Gurktal Nappe System) and the structurally lower amphibolite-facies Waxenegg Nappe (Koralpe-Wölz Nappe System). In the latter, polymetamorphism was previously inferred. However, the timing of metamorphism is poorly resolved and only limited geochronology exists in the Schöckel Nappe.Detailed petrographic investigations of chloritoid-bearing phyllite and micaschist samples collected at two localities at the base and in a higher structural level of the Schöckel Nappe revealed complex phase relations of REE-minerals, involving multiple REE-epidote generations that may be associated with monazite, xenotime, apatite and zircon. In garnet-bearing micaschist of the Waxenegg Nappe, we observed large (up to 500 µm) monazite exhibiting distinct core-rim chemical zoning. From careful documentation of the microstructural phase relations, thermodynamic modeling, Raman spectroscopy of carbonaceous matter and in-situ LA-ICPMS U-(Th)-Pb dating of REE-epidote and monazite we show that rocks in all three localities were affected by LP metamorphism (0.3 – 0.4 GPa) during the Permian event (250 – 282 Ma) with peak temperatures decreasing from 560°C in the lower to 475°C in the upper nappe. During the Eo-Alpine event, overprinting at c. 90 Ma occurred under conditions of ~550°C and 1.0 – 1.1 GPa in the Waxenegg Nappe. At the base of the Schöckel Nappe, peak metamorphism at ~450 – 470°C and 0.4 – 0.7 GPa and cooling below 300°C likely took place before 110 Ma. Towards higher structural levels, only limited Eo-Alpine overprinting at low P-T conditions (<400°C, 0.3 – 0.5 GPa) is evident, thus the observed mineral assemblage reflects mostly Permian metamorphism.Our results demonstrate that the main metamorphic signature in the Schöckel Nappe can be resolved as the Permian event and that the Eo-Alpine overprint is relatively lower grade than previously proposed. We observe a marked increase in Eo-Alpine peak conditions (~80 – 100°C, 0.3 – 0.5 GPa) across the nappe contact with higher grade rocks in the footwall compared to the hanging wall. The metamorphic pattern is consistent with the existence of a major normal fault between the Drauzug-Gurktal Nappe and Koralpe-Wölz Nappe systems in the easternmost part of the Austroalpine Unit, as already identified in its central and western parts. Finally, our study highlights that coupling modern thermobarometric analytical approaches with high spatial resolution geochronology on accessory minerals is critical to improve our understanding of the fundamentally important low-grade units of orogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→