MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322005309 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7313

Wave generation due to the collapse of partially and fully submerged granular columns in large-scale laboratory experiments

2023· preprint· en· W4322005309 on OpenAlexaff
Erica Treflik-Body, Elisabeth Steel, W. Andy Take, Ryan P. Mulligan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEarthquake and Tsunami Effects
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySubmarine landslideGeomechanicsLandslideGeotechnical engineeringSubmarine pipelineSubaerialFlumeSeismologyOffshore geotechnical engineeringAmplitudeMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under changing climate, coastal regions are increasingly vulnerable to a variety of hazards, including rapid subaerial and submarine landslides. These hazards can generate tsunamis and dense turbidity currents, which threaten both onshore and offshore infrastructure. Due to the complex geomechanics of failure, limited physical modelling has been conducted that encompasses both the triggering of granular landslides and subsequent waves associated with partially and fully submerged mass failures. Further, experimental modelling of submerged failures has primarily focused on the waves generated in the direction of failure (seaward) and not on the waves formed above and behind the failure (shoreward). To this effect, a series of large-scale granular collapse experiments were conducted by releasing 0.75 m and 0.5 m tall columns of 9.25 mm nominal diameter river stone into reservoir depths ranging from 0.20 m to 1.10 m to explore the wave generation and runup processes in both seaward and shoreward directions. The columns were released by a pneumatically-actuated vertically rising gate designed for the 2.10 m wide and 1.20 m high glass-walled flume. The gate lifts rapidly in 0.7 s, which enables the instantaneous loss of support of the source volumes and results in granular collapse. The wave amplitude is measured using wave capacitance gauges and the failure mechanics are captured with high speed cameras. Overall, the wave amplitudes measured in these highly instrumented large-scale physical models are in good agreement with empirical relationships developed in a previous study using smaller-scale models. The large-scale experimental results provide insight and opportunity to develop relationships between the initial column submergence depth and the magnitude of the shoreward propagating waves, which has previously not been explored. Connecting the amplitude of the waves with the tsunamigenic potential for partially to fully submerged granular materials will assist in understanding risk to offshore infrastructure and communities in coastal regions.    

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEarthquake and Tsunami EffectsFrench-language works237,207