MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322006188 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7837

Soil Moisture Estimation over Crop Fields Combined with Fully Polarimetric SAR and Passive Microwave Products Data

2023· preprint· en· W4322006188 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hongtao Shi, Kai Qin, Fengkai Lang, Lingli Zhao, Yaqin Sun, Jinqi Zhao, Jie Qin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarimetryRemote sensingSoil scienceWater contentEnvironmental scienceScatteringSynthetic aperture radarDielectricMathematicsMaterials sciencePhysicsGeographyGeologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High spatial resolution soil moisture (SM) mapping is essential for a wide range of applications, especially for precision irrigation and crop management. This work proposes an SM estimation method combined with time series of L-band fully polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) and passive SM products over crop areas. Regarding the challenge of eliminating vegetation canopy scattering on SM estimation, model-based polarimetric decomposition is implemented as a pretreatment step in which the surface scattering component in both HH and VV channels are extracted. Afterward, dual-pol surface scattering information normalization is dealt with the cosine-squared incidence angle normalization method, which makes it possible for SM inversion with multiple tracks and multi-incidence SAR observations. With the time series of normalized surface scattering information, the alpha approximation-based change detection algorithm (AACD) is used for SM estimation. Since the AACD algorithm is reported with an underdetermined problem of parameter solution and the underestimation issue of soil moisture inversion, an extended AACD which incorporates dual-pol (HH and VV) SAR observations, namely the Dual-pol AACD algorithm, is proposed in this study. Besides, the minimum and maximum values of passive microwave soil moisture data of the whole study area and the entire study period are introduced as constraints in Dual-pol AACD when solving the unknown parameters of the real part of the soil dielectric constant. Finally, the obtained time series of soil dielectric constants are converted to volumetric soil water content using dielectric mixing model. 56 sets of collected UAVSAR L-band data with 4 different flight lines (#31603, #31604, #31605, #31606) of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada in 2012 (SMAPVEX12) are used to validate the Dual-pol AACD algorithm. Passive microwave SM constraints are collected from Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR-2) products. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated by comparing the in-situ measurements against the soil moisture estimates of wheat, corn, soybeans, bean, and canola fields at different phenological stages. Results show that the proposed method provides an accuracy of RMSE ≤ 6.5 cm3•cm-3 over all the selected crop fields, which is better than that without the introduction of constraints from passive microwave SM products. This work also compares the SM estimation performance using constraints from SMOS and AMSR-2. In addition, SM estimates in different crop fields and growth stages are also provided regarding the variation of crop morphological characteristics and biophysical properties. It concludes that the proposed SM estimation method has great potential for local and global SM mapping in a high resolution with existing and upcoming L-band SAR data, such as ALOS-2 (Japan), LT-1 (China), NISAR (America and India) and Tandem-L (Germany), etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207