MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4322007492 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9114

Cluster-based hyperparameter optimisation for LSTM-based flow forecasting in Canadian catchments

2023· preprint· en· W4322007492 on OpenAlexaffabout
Usman T. Khan, Everett Snieder

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperparameterCluster analysisHyperparameter optimizationComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceHeuristicGridData miningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improvements in large dataset availability and computing power have led to an increase in large-sample hydrological (LSH) studies. While these studies bring a breadth of new knowledge, they also introduce new challenges. One such challenge is the optimisation of model hyperparameters, which can be prohibitively computationally expensive on a large scale. Machine learning (ML)-based flow forecasting models have been steadily rising in popularity due to their high accuracy and ease of development. While traditional physics-based models have hyperparameters rooted in hydrological concepts (e.g., the number of hydraulic response units is determined based on spatial heterogeneity), ML-based models do not typically use a physical basis for selecting hyperparameters (e.g., neural network topology). Instead, ML model hyperparameters are typically determined using heuristic or exhaustive search methods. Clustering has been previously applied to watersheds for identifying homogenous regions for flood frequency analyses. In these cases, unsupervised clustering, based on static watershed characteristics and flow statistics, is used to identify homogenous regions on which to conduct frequency analyses. We propose an application of clustering to optimise ML model hyperparameters on a large scale. The objective of this study is to determine whether grid-search optimisations are transferrable to similar catchments, identified through unsupervised clustering. Our study is conducted using a subset of Canadian catchments (n>500) from the HYSETS database. For each catchment, an LSTM is trained to forecast flow at a daily resolution using hydrometeorological input features (flow, precipitation, temperature, SWE). Grid-search hyperparameter optimisation is conducted on model architecture (number of hidden states and layers), learning rate, dropout rate, and input sequence length. We evaluate the effectiveness of cluster-based hyperparameter optimisation based on a comparison against a non-optimised baseline, for an increasing number of clusters. The impacts of this work have the potential to improve the effectiveness of ML-based flow forecasting models in cases where exhaustive hyperparameter searches are not possible. The results will also allow us to make recommendations for typical hyperparameter values based on watershed characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.374
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→