MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322007524 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-8841

Spatio-temporal clustering on a high-performance computing platform for high-resolution monitoring network analysis

2023· preprint· en· W4322007524 on OpenAlexaff
Colin Lee, Paul A. Makar, Joana Soares

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsGovernment of CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceData miningSimilarity (geometry)Classification of discontinuitiesAir quality indexInstrumentation (computer programming)Hierarchical clusteringNetwork monitoringReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air quality monitoring networks provide invaluable data for studying human health, environmental impacts, and the effects of policy changes,  but obtaining high quality data can be costly, with each site in a monitoring network requiring instrumentation and skilled operator time. It is therefore important to ensure that each monitor in the network is providing unique data to maximize the value of the entire network.  Differences in measurement approaches for the same chemical between monitoring stations may also result in discontinuities in the network data.  Both of these factors suggest the need for objective, machine-learning methodologies for monitoring network data analysis.   Air quality models are another valuable tool to augment monitoring networks.  The models simulate air quality over a large region where monitoring may be sparse. The gridded output from air-quality models thus contain inherent information on the similarity of sources, chemical oxidation pathways and removal processes for chemicals of interest, provided appropriate tools are available to identify these similarities on a gridded basis.  The output from these models can be immense, again requiring the use of special, highly optimized tools for post-processing analysis.Spatiotemporal clustering is a family of techniques that have seen widespread use in air quality, whereby time-series taken at different locations are grouped based on the level of similarity between time-series data within the dataset.   Hierarchical clustering is one such algorithm, which has the advantage of not requiring an a priori assumption about how many clusters there might be (unlike K-means).  However, traditional approaches for hierarchical clustering become computationally expensive as the number of time-series increases in size, resulting in prohibitive computational costs  when the total number of time-series to be compared rises above 30,000, even on a supercomputer.  Similarly, the comparison and clustering of large numbers of discrete data (such as multiple mass spectrometer data sampled at high time resolution from a moving laboratory platform) becomes computationally prohibitive using conventional methods. In this study we present a high-performance hierarchical clustering algorithm which is able to run in parallel over many nodes on massively parallel computer systems, thus allowing for efficient clustering for very large monitoring network and model output datasets.   The new high-performance program is able to cluster 290,000 annual time series (from either monitoring network data or gridded model output) in 13 hours on 800 nodes. We present here some example results showing how the algorithm can be used to analyse very large datasets, providing new insights into “airsheds” depicting regions of similar chemical origin and history, different spatial regimes for nitrogen, sulphur, and base cation deposition, .  These analyses show how different processes control each species at different potential monitoring site locations, via cluster-generated airshed maps for each species. The efficiency and flexibility of the algorithm allows for extremely large datasets to be analysed in hours of wall-clock time instead of weeks or months. The new algorithm is being used as the numerical engine for a new tool for the analysis of EU monitoring network data. 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207