MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322007842 · doi:10.36106/paripex/9600192

CONGENITAL PALATAL FISTULA IN ASSOCIATION WITH INTRANASAL ECTOPIC TOOTH: A RARE CASE REPORT.

2023· article· en· W4322007842 on OpenAlexaff
Barman Shibsankar, Sarkar Ruchirendu, Biswajit Mondal

Bibliographic record

VenuePARIPEX INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCleft Lip and Palate Research
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFistulaEtiologyMaxillaMedicineDentistryPathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital Palatal Fistula is a rare condition and usually associated with cleft lip1. Presence of an isolated congenital palatal fistula is very rare. In 1904, von Bergmann noted that the rarest form was a cleft between the palatine processes of the maxilla only, with intact structures posteriorly and anteriorly2. Subsequently, in 1931, Veau and Borel reported the first case of a congenital fistula of the hard palate4. Over the last century, there have been fewer than 30 cases described in the literature2 . Exact aetiology of this condition remains unclear. Reported correction techniques are highly variable

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePARIPEX INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCHSame topicCleft Lip and Palate ResearchFrench-language works237,207