MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322009923 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-8297

Scalable machine learning solution for commercial scale three dimensional geophysical inversions

2023· preprint· en· W4322009923 on OpenAlexaffabout
Souvik Mukherjee, Peter G. Lelièvre

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityComputer scienceInversion (geology)WorkflowArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learningAlgorithmBig dataScale (ratio)GeophysicsComputational scienceData miningGeologyDatabaseGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scalable machine learning solution for commercial scale three dimensional geophysical inversionsSouvik Mukherjee1, Santi Adavani2*, Alan Morgan3, William N. Barkhouse4, Ronald S. Bell4, Peter G. Lelievre5, Colin G. Farquharson61EmPact-AI, USA, 2*RocketML, now at S2 Labs, USA, 3Bell Geospace, USA, 4Drone Geoscience, USA, 5Mt. Allison University, Canada, 6Memorial University, CanadaAbstractApplication of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based workflows and methodologies for geophysical data processing, imaging, and interpretation are active focus areas in industry and academia. While much progress has been made to demonstrate applicability in many use cases, key bottle neck for widespread commercial use has been the prohibitively high computational cost involved in applying the method for large scale three dimensional inverse problems.Key changes to the form of the simulated input data used for training and the corresponding design of the architecture of the hidden layers enable approximately O(n) (where n is the number of layers in the network) reduction in the computational complexity of the training architecture. Combined with multi-GPU Distributed Deep Learning (DDL) algorithms optimized specifically for training large scale ML data, this results in significant improvements in resolution of inversion results relative to conventional least squares imaging, while computational efficiency improves by order of magnitude compared to several commonly used open-source ML architectures and platforms.When deployed for inversion of dense, closely spaced high resolution handheld magnetometer data collected over a buried pipe in a field in Texas, the resolved three-dimensional geometry and location using the new algorithm showed over 6-fold improvement compared to conventional three-dimensional least squares inversion. When applied to an 18-fold larger data set collected by a drone-based magnetometer over a field in California, the buried complex metallic pipe like structure was resolved using little over 2 days of compute time. Similar exercise undertaken in google collab GPU platform using state-of-the-art google tensorflow would have taken 3 – 6 months to complete, suggesting a 50 – 100-fold improvement in computational efficiency.The method was also benchmarked against Los Alamos National Laboratory’s (LANL) open-source seismic full waveform inversion (FWI) dataset. LANL trained 24000 seismic data sets simulated from various 2D velocity models using 32 P100 Tesla GPU machines in 2 hours. When inferenced on 6000 previously unseen test models, the root mean square error (RMSE) in the inverted normalized velocity models was 0.018. The current workflow on the same data set achieved a comparable RMSE of 0.012 on 6000 unseen test models after training 24000 models in 50 minutes using just 4 GPU (V100) machines, achieving nearly 20-fold improvement in computational efficiency.In addition to magnetic and seismic data, the method is being developed for applications to electromagnetic and full tensor gravity gradiometer (FTG) data. Given the significant improvements in resolution and computational efficiency, it is expected that successful ground truth based field trials of AI based geophysical data inversion has the potential to unlock several new application areas while dramatically improving the business impact of such applications in existing ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207