HYPE model workflow – a “bottom-up” approach to community large-domain hydrological modelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large-domain hydrological modelling is vital to understand and predict water resources under a changing climate. Here we summarize our efforts to develop a model configuration workflow for the Hydrological Predictions for the Environment (HYPE) model as a proof-of-concept of a “bottom-up” approach to community large-scale hydrological modelling. The initiative of Community Workflows to Advance Reproducibility in Hydrologic Modeling (CWARHM, Knoben et al. 2022) provides a blueprint of a hydrological modelling workflow, separating the model-agnostic and model-specific pre-processing tasks. We extend the CWARHM blueprint to establish an open-source and automated HYPE workflow by adding processing codes to generate geospatial fabric, climate forcing, and parametrization.Our primary contribution is to generalize and automate the HYPE workflow to improve the reproducibility of hydrologic experiments. In this research, numerous global geographic, physiographic, and climatic datasets, covering various spatiotemporal scales are used to develop a geospatial fabric and climate forcing for the HYPE model, using the Bow River watershed in Alberta, Canada as a test case. The geographic and physiographic data are obtained through the “gistool” (https://github.com/kasra-keshavarz/gistool), while climate forcing is obtained using the “datatool” (https://github.com/kasra-keshavarz/datatool). Independent of the data source, these tools provide physiographic attributes and meteorological time series as catchment averaged quantities, enabling semi-distributed hydrological modelling with HYPE. The preliminary analysis shows that the HYPE workflow has successfully separated the model-agnostic and model-specific parts of the model workflow. It substantially reduces manual work in preparing model geospatial fabric and input datasets, saving more time for hydrological analysis. This workflow will support developing probabilistic streamflow using different input datasets and will be upgraded to create a HYPE model instantiation for the entire North American domain.Reference: Knoben, W. J. M., Clark, M. P., Bales, J., Bennett, A., Gharari, S., Marsh, C. B., et al. (2022). Community Workflows to Advance Reproducibility in Hydrologic Modeling: Separating model-agnostic and model-specific configuration steps in applications of large-domain hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 58, e2021WR031753. https://doi. org/10.1029/2021WR031753
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".