MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322010720 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-12872

MT data inversion and dimensionality analysis in Varton geothermal central Iran

2023· preprint· en· W4322010720 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Hajheidari, Sayyed Mohammad Abtahi Forooshani, Nader Fathianpour, Keytash Moshtaghian, Hojatollah Tavakoli Harandi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetotelluricsGeologyGeothermal gradientElectrical resistivity and conductivityInversion (geology)Fault (geology)Hydrothermal circulationGeophysicsGeothermal explorationSeismologyPetrologyMineralogyGeothermal energyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Varton geothermal is located circa 70 kilometers northeast of Isfahan, central Iran. The study area consists of highly fractured rocks with argillic alteration zones and some hot springs. Here, we conduct a magnetic and magnetotelluric data survey to study the effect of the fractures on the hydrothermal convection system. The magnetic data processing exposed two parallel main faults with NW-SE strike in the northern and southern borders of the area. Here, we used nine magnetotelluric (MT) stations along a profile perpendicular to the main faults. Dimensionality analysis of MT impedance and phase tensors in the stations indicated a media with two-dimensional structures. However, 1D MT data inversion revealed a three-layered earth beneath most stations, though the layers' thickness and resistivities varied along the profile. Also, 2D MT data inversion results showed that the resistivity between the two main faults was significantly smaller than zones beyond the faults. However, a large zone with low resistivity was close to the southern fault. Besides, a shallow layer overlain a thin conductive layer with a resistivity of one ohmm or less. In depths more than 500 m, the resistivity noticeably increased gradually to 1000 ohmm. According to the mentioned results, we deduce that the southern fault is the main feeding fault for the geothermal system. Furthermore, the layer with the lowest resistivity correlates with clay alteration and could be the clay cap of the reservoir. Therefore, the deeper resistive rock is the geothermal reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207