MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4322011189 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9271

Long-term trends and radiative impact in vertically resolved stratospheric water vapour from ESA WV_cci data records

2023· preprint· en· W4322011189 on OpenAlexaff
Hao Ye, Michaela I. Hegglin, Daan Hubert, Jean‐Christopher Lambert, Kaley A. Walker, Christopher E. Sioris, Luis Millán, G. L. Manney, L. Froidevaux, Brian J. Kerridge, Richard Siddans, Ray H. J. Wang, David A. Plummer, Martina Krämer, Christian Rolf, Keith P. Shine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratosphereTroposphereWater vaporRadiative forcingEnvironmental scienceRadiative transferAtmospheric sciencesAtmosphere (unit)ClimatologyClimate changeMeteorologyGeographyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water vapour in the upper troposphere and stratosphere has a significant impact both on the radiative and chemical properties of the atmosphere. Reliable water vapour climate data records (CDRs) are essential for use in climate research, to assess vertically resolved trends and associated radiative impacts. Within the ESA Water Vapour Climate Change Initiative (WV_cci), new vertically resolved water vapour CDRs in the stratosphere and UTLS were merged from a range of satellite observations. In this contribution, we provide an overview of these CDRs, highlighting innovations in the merging methodologies and results from a detailed quality assessment. In particular, the long-term trends derived from the new water vapour CDRs are compared to other merged datasets, reanalyses, and simulations from chemistry-climate models, with the ESA WV_cci CDRs deemed to be valuable new datasets for climate studies. We conclude that, mostly driven by dynamical variability, the derived water vapour trends vary significantly depending on the dataset used, chosen time period and location in the atmosphere. Using an off-line radiative transfer model, we estimate the consequence of these differences on the radiative forcing from water vapour changes in the upper troposphere and stratosphere over the past 30+ years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→