MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322013043 · doi:10.12912/27197050/160002

Environmental Assessment Using Canadian Water Quality Index for Hilla River in Babylon Governorate, Iraq

2023· article· en· W4322013043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Engineering & Environmental Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Water qualityWater resource managementEnvironmental scienceGeographyArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most significant natural resources is water because it is a necessity. It is all of a man's social and economic endeavors across a variety of disciplines. Water differs from other natural resources in that its supply is fixed globally and is replenished over a set time period according to the hydrological cycle. Recent neglect of the severe decline in water sources has resulted in this situation. The Iraqi environment has significantly deteriorated over the past 20 years, beginning with air pollution and ending with soil and water pollution. This is because there are numerous sources of pollution in Iraq's water supply, and there are no plans in place to build and strengthen the infrastructure that will allow for the provision of clean water. As a result of the water pollution in Iraq, drinking water, rivers, surface water, and ground water were also contaminated. The Water Quality Index (WQI) developed by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) is one of the tools that academics use the most frequently to evaluate water resources and quantify their contamination levels. The goal of the current study is to use the Canadian Water Mechanism Manual to assess the water quality at five stations along the Shatt Al-Hilla river in the Iraqi province of Babylon. The current research demonstrates how the Shatt Al-Hilla River and five other locations in Babel City, Iraq, were evaluated using the Water Quality Index developed by the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME WQI). The fieldwork was finished in April 2019, between November 2018, and this month. The CCME WQI was built using thirteen factors for measuring water quality (Chromium, Chemical oxygen demand, Lead, Biological oxygen demand, Dissolved oxygen, Turbidity, Sulphate, Nitrite, Nitrate, Total Hardness, Total Dissolved Solids, pH magnitude and Water temperature). The average magnitudes for five stations along the CCME WQI for the Shatt Al-Hilla River ranged from 61.94 to 81.93 depending on the index's findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it