MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4322020175 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-16782

A Preliminary Green Function Database for Global 3-D Centroid Moment Tensor Inversions

2023· preprint· en· W4322020175 on OpenAlexaff
Lucas Sawade, Liang Ding, Daniel Peter, Hom Nath Gharti, Qinya Liu, M. Nettles, Göran Ekström, Jeroen Tromp

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismogramComputationCentroidAlgorithmComputer scienceInversion (geology)GeologySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, the accuracy of synthetic seismograms used for Global CMT inversion, which are based on modern 3D Earth models, is limited by the validity of the path-average approximation for mode summation and surface-wave ray theory. Inaccurate computation of the ground motion’s amplitude and polarization as well as other effects that are not modeled may bias inverted earthquake parameters. Synthetic seismograms of higher accuracy will improve the determination of seismic sources in the CMT analysis, and remove concerns about this source of uncertainty. Strain tensors, and databases thereof, have recently been implemented for the spectral-element solver SPECFEM3D (Ding et al., 2020) based on the theory of previous work (Zhao et al., 2006) for regional inversion of seismograms for earthquake parameters. The main barriers to a global database of Green functions have been storage, I/O, and computation. But, compression tricks and smart selection of spectral elements, fast I/O data formats for high-performance computing, such as ADIOS, and wave-equation solution on GPUs, have dramatically decreased the cost of storage, I/O, and computation, respectively. Additionally, the global spectral-element grid matches the accuracy of a full forward calculation by virtue of Lagrange interpolation. Here, we present our first preliminary database of stored Green functions for 17 seismic stations of the global seismic networks to be used in future 3-D centroid moment tensor inversions. We demonstrate the fast retrieval and computation of seismograms from the database.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→