MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322097779 · doi:10.23880/ppej-16000312

Experimental Viscosity Data for Binary and Ternary Systems of Arab Heavy Crude Oil and Diluents

2022· article· en· W4322097779 on OpenAlexaff
A Miadonye

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTernary operationDiluentViscosityWaxPipeline (software)Crude oilPetroleum engineeringThermodynamicsBinary numberChemistryMaterials scienceMathematicsComputer scienceGeologyOrganic chemistryEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To meet the global exponential demand for crude oil, development of unconventional crude oil deposits is essential but the major limitation is seen in pipeline transportation, given its exceptionally high viscosity. Saudi Aramco is the world’s leading crude oil producer with a significant contribution of Arab Heavy crude oil in the total production mix. In this paper, we have measured the viscosities of both binary and ternary mixtures of this heavy oil crude for the first time, using toluene and natural gas condensate fluids over temperatures encountered in pipeline transportation. Our study shows that both binary and ternary systems show excellent viscosity reduction characteristics with increase in viscosity index with temperature. The degree of viscosity reduction shows polynomial trends with excellent fits that facilitated the determination of the wax appearance temperature using differential calculus approach. The range of experimental temperature in this study and the excellent viscosity reduction characteristics of the systems testify to the suitability of our experimental data for pipeline transportation planning

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePetroleum & Petrochemical Engineering JournalSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207