MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322101234 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2023.0032

Écrans motiles éd. par Sylvain Campeau

2023· article· fr· W4322101234 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine Gaughan

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArtistic and Creative Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterArtCriticismVisual artsContext (archaeology)PoetryMayaArt historyAestheticsLiteratureHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Écrans motiles éd. par Sylvain Campeau Catherine Gaughan Campeau, Sylvain, éd. Écrans motiles. PU de Montréal, 2021. ISBN 978-2-7606-4452-6. Pp. 278. Écrans motiles is a compelling investigation that delves into the complex nature of video projections and installations as well as the various screens and monitors associated with the art form. Written in French and divided into eleven chapters, each one focusing on a particular artist and their aesthetic approach in an attempt to better understand the creative process, the figure of the screen in their works remains the central focus of the book. With a background in poetry and art criticism, Sylvain Campeau explores video projections by well-established as well as lesser-known artists based in Quebec, the United States, and Canada, such as Mireille Baril, Stan Douglas, Milutin Gubash, and Jacynthe Carrier. Looking at the distinction between movie screens, flat screens, and TV screens and their proliferation today, the book considers the relationship between the image and the spectator and moves beyond more traditional visual studies focused on TV and cinema. Original and thought-provoking, the analyses recognize the contribution of artists like Stan Brakhage and Maya Deren while citing exhibits and examples from more contemporary works. Moreover, the stunning stills throughout offer a better understanding of the various artists and their works, particularly the elements of the mise en scène and the context of the installations, and convey the versatility of video projections as an art form. With a fascinating conclusion entitled "Le continuum-image," which highlights some of the exciting new aesthetic challenges ahead, the book reveals insight into what the future might hold for the medium. Écrans motiles will provide a keen reference point for a vastly unexplored field of study while offering insight into the diverse and dynamic nature of video projection and its wide-ranging artistic practices. [End Page 291] Catherine Gaughan Toronto Metropolitan University (Ontario, Canada) Copyright © 2023 American Association of Teachers of French

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2130.125

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicArtistic and Creative ResearchFrench-language works237,207