MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322152985 · doi:10.1353/bio.2022.0042

Editor's Note

2022· article· en· W4322152985 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiography · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAutobiographical and Biographical Writing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyChinaGeorge (robot)HistoryRelevance (law)RealmClassicsArt historyMedia studiesSociologyLawPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editor's Note Craig Howes When George Simson started this journal in 1978, in addition to declaring it would be an interdisciplinary quarterly—which in those days pretty much meant literary, historical, and psychological—he also hoped to make it a forum for international discussions of what he definitely thought of as "biography," but which over the years has come to take on the contours associated with "life writing"—the same thing etymologically, of course, but something now very different in the critical and theoretical realm. George pursued this goal of international relevance relentlessly. The first conference and proceedings publication sponsored by the journal, New Directions in Biography (1981), brought together biographers and subjects ranging from Japan, Great Britain, Africa, France, the United States, Canada, and the former Yugoslavia. Shortly after the creation of the Center for Biographical Research at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa in 1988, another conference and proceedings volume, Biography East and West (1989), leaned heavily into biographical research dealing with or emerging from Japan, China, India, and the "Third World"—South Africa, Palestine, and Oceania—as well as essays dealing with European observers looking East. One of George's last initiatives before his retirement as director of the Center in 1997 was a conference (1995) and proceedings on Life Writing from the Pacific Rim: Essays from Japan, China, Indonesia, India, and Siam, with a Psychological Overview (1997), part of an initiative—never realized—to create a Histories of Asian Biography series under the Center's monograph imprint. Over the past twenty-five years, the journal's and the Center's commitment to global inclusion has resulted in the International Auto/Biography Association's conference on Life Writing and Translations, held in Honolulu in 2008, with a special issue of Biography devoted to the topic in 2009, and in such Biography Monographs as Locating Life Stories: Beyond East-West Binaries in (Auto)Biographical Studies (2012), edited by Maureen Perkins, containing essays from Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Malaysia, South Africa, and Hawai'i. And any glance through the tables of contents for the past hundred or so issues of the journal will also encounter a very substantial number of articles not emerging from subjects or writers located within the Western Europe/North American corridor, and even entire special issues devoted to such subjects as "Baleful Postcoloniality" (2013), or "Caste and Life Narratives" (2017), later published as an edited collection by Primus Books in Delhi in 2019. Finally, under the able editorial direction of John [End Page v] David Zuern, for the past few years our International Year in Review feature has offered brief overviews of interesting developments in a host of countries and regions. I am mentioning this constant in the life of Biography and the Center because when considering the contents of this "regular" issue, I realized that what began as an aspiration has with great effort become the norm. The five articles in this installment feature writers and subjects from South Africa, Uganda, Lebanon, India, and France, representing an equally diverse range of approaches to life writing—whether through fashion, documentaries, oral histories, photographs, memoirs, biographies, or "anti-biographies." I believe that George would find some of the theoretical approaches or topics puzzling—certainly far afield from biography as he understood and loved it. But I know he would be very happy that his dream of a journal that made its best effort to be international has been realized. And it will continue to do so. [End Page vi] Copyright © 2022 The George and Marguerite Simson Biographical Research Center

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it