MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4322152985 · doi:10.1353/bio.2022.0042

Editor's Note

2022· article· en· W4322152985 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBiography · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAutobiographical and Biographical Writing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiographyChinaGeorge (robot)HistoryRelevance (law)RealmClassicsArt historyMedia studiesSociologyLawPolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editor's Note Craig Howes When George Simson started this journal in 1978, in addition to declaring it would be an interdisciplinary quarterly—which in those days pretty much meant literary, historical, and psychological—he also hoped to make it a forum for international discussions of what he definitely thought of as "biography," but which over the years has come to take on the contours associated with "life writing"—the same thing etymologically, of course, but something now very different in the critical and theoretical realm. George pursued this goal of international relevance relentlessly. The first conference and proceedings publication sponsored by the journal, New Directions in Biography (1981), brought together biographers and subjects ranging from Japan, Great Britain, Africa, France, the United States, Canada, and the former Yugoslavia. Shortly after the creation of the Center for Biographical Research at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa in 1988, another conference and proceedings volume, Biography East and West (1989), leaned heavily into biographical research dealing with or emerging from Japan, China, India, and the "Third World"—South Africa, Palestine, and Oceania—as well as essays dealing with European observers looking East. One of George's last initiatives before his retirement as director of the Center in 1997 was a conference (1995) and proceedings on Life Writing from the Pacific Rim: Essays from Japan, China, Indonesia, India, and Siam, with a Psychological Overview (1997), part of an initiative—never realized—to create a Histories of Asian Biography series under the Center's monograph imprint. Over the past twenty-five years, the journal's and the Center's commitment to global inclusion has resulted in the International Auto/Biography Association's conference on Life Writing and Translations, held in Honolulu in 2008, with a special issue of Biography devoted to the topic in 2009, and in such Biography Monographs as Locating Life Stories: Beyond East-West Binaries in (Auto)Biographical Studies (2012), edited by Maureen Perkins, containing essays from Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Malaysia, South Africa, and Hawai'i. And any glance through the tables of contents for the past hundred or so issues of the journal will also encounter a very substantial number of articles not emerging from subjects or writers located within the Western Europe/North American corridor, and even entire special issues devoted to such subjects as "Baleful Postcoloniality" (2013), or "Caste and Life Narratives" (2017), later published as an edited collection by Primus Books in Delhi in 2019. Finally, under the able editorial direction of John [End Page v] David Zuern, for the past few years our International Year in Review feature has offered brief overviews of interesting developments in a host of countries and regions. I am mentioning this constant in the life of Biography and the Center because when considering the contents of this "regular" issue, I realized that what began as an aspiration has with great effort become the norm. The five articles in this installment feature writers and subjects from South Africa, Uganda, Lebanon, India, and France, representing an equally diverse range of approaches to life writing—whether through fashion, documentaries, oral histories, photographs, memoirs, biographies, or "anti-biographies." I believe that George would find some of the theoretical approaches or topics puzzling—certainly far afield from biography as he understood and loved it. But I know he would be very happy that his dream of a journal that made its best effort to be international has been realized. And it will continue to do so. [End Page vi] Copyright © 2022 The George and Marguerite Simson Biographical Research Center

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,794
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,201
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle