MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4322208641 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu23-15798

Influence of hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes on tidal wetland landscape evolution for Making Room for Wetlands in the Bay of Fundy

2023· preprint· en· W4322208641 on OpenAlexaffabout
Danika van Proosdij, Megan Elliott, Samantha Lewis, Jennie Graham, Kailey Nichols, Tony Bowron

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Canadian institutionsCree Board of Health and Social Services of James BaySaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayBeach morphodynamicsWetlandEstuaryPhragmitesHydrology (agriculture)Salt marshGeologyDikeSedimentErosionWater levelLandformOceanographySediment transportGeomorphologyGeographyEcologyPaleontologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Managed dyke realignment is increasing being implemented in the Upper Bay of Fundy Canada in response to increased vulnerability of dyke infrastructure to erosion and overtopping. The Making Room for Wetlands project was initiated in 2017 to develop an evidence-based framework for implementing managed realignment (MR) and tidal wetland restoration in this hypertidal estuary. MR was conducted at two sites: Converse (near mouth of Missiguash River) and Belcher St. (near head of Cornwallis River) and included both pre and post restoration monitoring of hydrology, soils & sediments, vegetation and morphology. Earthworks included removal of an aboiteau structure, channel excavation, inner dyke construction and levelling of old dyke infrastructure. Detailed hydrodynamics, sediment transport and deposition data were collected seasonally at the Converse site since first tidal waters were introduced in Dec 2018. Ecomorphodynamic changes were quantified using repeat high resolution RPAS surveys, field measurements and RSET stations at both sites. The rate of evolution of tidal wetland landscape differed between the two sites. High sedimentation rates (~10 cm/yr) associated with the turbidity maximum at Belcher provided a disturbance surface rapidly colonized by annual halophytes and was fully vegetated by Year 3 with a mix of tidal brackish species (equivalent to reference site). Sedimentation also played a role at Converse, filling in the borrow pit used to construct the inner dyke within the first two years, facilitating the development of a shallow tidal creek network. Additional sedimentation over the former agricultural surface aided in slower development of a hybrid creek network incorporating the relict ditches. Large spring tides play an important role in sediment supply to the marsh platform. Positive sediment flux values into the site were recorded in association with erosion of the inlet channel which typically occurred during higher spring tide events. A preliminary model linking sediment flux at the inlet with deposition on the marsh surface was developed. While some halophytic vegetation was established within the first two years at Converse, vegetation established increased markedly in Year 4. Erosion of the tidal inlet during high spring tides provided important subsidies of sediment in addition to baseline concentrations within tidal waters to the marsh platform that facilitated the evolution of the tidal wetland landscape. While the establishment of tidal marsh vegetation was slower at Converse than Belcher both are providing ecosystem services. Implications for modelling the trajectory of tidal wetlands after managed realignment including MR design, timing of earthworks and position within the estuary are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics→French-language works237,207→