MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322213250 · doi:10.14740/wjon1567

Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma Presenting as an Isolated Splenic Metastasis: An Update

2023· review· en· W4322213250 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Saeed Ali Alshehri, Toka M.R.A. Hussein, Mahmoud R. Hussein

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Oncology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMelanomaSpleenMetastasisMalignancyPathologyCancerCancer researchImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the spleen is a highly vascularized organ, metastatic deposits from non-hematolymphoid solid malignancies are rare. This is reasoned to the inherent resistance of the splenic parenchyma to harbor metastases. The splenic capsule, lack of afferent lymphatics, contractile properties of the spleen, and the angular and gyroid course of the splenic artery form several barriers against the metastatic spread of malignant tumors. Moreover, the immune cells in the white and red pulps of the spleen have strong defensive ability against the tumor cells. Metastasis from solid tumors to the spleen often occurs only during widespread distant spread. Malignant melanoma is a rare but fatal malignancy. Isolated splenic metastasis from malignant melanoma is exceptionally rare. Studies that addressed the splenic metastasis from cutaneous malignant melanoma are scarce. This minireview was performed to address this subject. Here we present an overview of the clinicopathologic features of isolated splenic metastatic melanoma. The diagnostic biochemical markers in melanoma are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of OncologySame topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207